Category Archives: campaign finance

2010 voter turnout up, but not for youth and blacks (UPDATED)

Flickr photo by Dean Terry

Preliminary evidence suggests that voting turnout among all Americans was up in the November 2010 election.  Compared with the last non-presidential election (2006), both voting turnout experts (Curtis Gans and Michael McDonald) agree that turnout among eligible voters rose 1.1-1.2 percentage points (based on preliminary estimates that will obviously change as all ballots are counted and certified). Regardless of whether one likes the outcome in 2010, it is civic good news that more Americans got involved.

Preliminary evidence suggests electoral turnout rose in at least nine states, and significantly in Texas, Florida and Minnesota.  Ohio and Pennsylvania, among other states, seems to have experienced a turnout decline.  [Curtis Gans projects voting turnout at 42 percent of registered voters; Michael McDonald believes that 41.5% of voting-eligible Americans turned out to vote.]  Note: McDonald has now lowered his turnout estimate 1.2 percentage points to 40.3% (VEP Highest Office Turnout, as of 11/8/10).

But the bad news is what voices are being heard or not heard. Voting turnout rates were down among young voters (18-29) and blacks made up a lower percentage of voters in 2010 than in 2008 when Obama’s candidacy excited African-Americans to vote.  For example, blacks made up 12% of voters in 2008 and appeared to make up just 10% of voters in 2010 (based on exit polls).  This drop, if it holds up in more authoritative numbers like the Current Population Survey would  negate this encouraging finding reported in 2008 that the black-white voting gap had disappeared.    [Exit polls suggest that Hispanics maintained their share of the electorate, rising from 7% in 2008 to 8% in 2010, although one would have to compare this rise against their expanding voting-eligible numbers to truly understand whether their political voice was diluted, and if so, how much.]  It wasn’t a simple story of the richest folks’ accounting for more of the votes, since those earning $100,000 or more accounted for 26% of the votes in both 2008 and 2010, but due to the elimination of restrictions on corporate campaign contributions in the wake of the 2010 Citizens United case, the wealthy disproportionately had chances to influence election outcomes even before voters got to their polling places.

[For information on 2008 turnout, click here.]

Advertisements

Another proud moment in pork politics

The New York Times reports that Republican Rep. Don Young, Alaska, the representative infamous for getting millions earmarked for Alaska’s ‘bridge to nowhere’ is at it again, and this time to benefit his donors, not his constituents.

In a 2006 transportation bill,  he added a $10 million earmark to extend Conconut Road in Florida.  Obviously his Alaska constituents didn’t care about this, and even the representative from that Florida district didn’t want the road and the local Florida county voted not to use the funds.  The road money was inserted to pay back a developer-donor to his campaign who owns property adjacent to the site of the road extension who would see the value of his holdings rise. When Young “was approached near the House floor by a reporter, [he] responded with an obscene gesture,” according to the NYT.

More grist for the mill for the need for tighter campaign finance reform.

Thank you Rep. Young for helping to destroy trust in government!  May you get your just desserts for having the disrespect for tax funds that come from hard-working U.S. citizens.